There is nothing remotely surprising about the sharp fall in oil prices over the last four months, except perhaps the timing. The fundamental forces driving prices lower (rising supply outside OPEC from shale and sluggish demand growth as result of conservation and substitution) have been clearly visible for at least two years.
Last year I wrote: "If the shale revolution can be sustained in the United States, and successfully exported to other countries, some combination of OPEC production cuts or lower oil prices to encourage demand and forestall more investment, will be inevitable by 2015-2016." In 2012, I wrote: "The massive rise in prices means Saudi Arabia will face intense competition from shale.Compounding the problem, projected oil demand is now expected to grow much more slowly than a few years ago as a result of conservation measures."
But it didn't require a crystal ball to see that prices above $100 per barrel were unsustainable. Inexorable increases in shale production have been evident in the reports published every month by North Dakota's Department of Mineral Resources and the U.S. Energy Information Administration. On the demand side, consumption of refined products in the U.S. is still more than 2 million barrels per day lower than it was in 2005, and the drop is more like 3 or 4 million barrels if population and output growth are taken into account.
With your current subscription plan you can comment on stories. However, before writing your first comment, please create a display name in the Profile section of your subscriber account page.