In his March 2 letter, "Unfair grading of social insight," Jeff Kingston takes umbrage at a critical review of a book he edited ("Critical Issues in Contemporay Japan"), saying the reviewer "unfairly impugns [his] colleagues professional insights."
While I am generally sympathetic with professor Kingston's political reviews, I did not find this review at all unprofessional or unfair. The reviewer simply took note that the articles in the volume seemed to support a similar viewpoint — something I also noticed.
With a volume like this, it is often a good idea to try to find at least one scholar who can articulate a dissenting position (even if it is something the editor finds difficult to swallow). Frankly, given Kingston's rather large presence on the pages of The Japan Times, I was somewhat relieved to see the newspaper publish a review that took a critical view of one of its own. No problem, I say.
The opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are the writer's own and do not necessarily reflect the policies of The Japan Times.
With your current subscription plan you can comment on stories. However, before writing your first comment, please create a display name in the Profile section of your subscriber account page.