The Feb. 4 Bloomberg article "Sony expected to beef up PlayStation 4 to keep consoles in the game" describes Sony's new console as capable of rendering games at 240 frames per second (fps). Current-generation games typically render at 30 or 60 fps.
However, the PlayStation 3 was actually capable of reaching a maximum 120 fps. I don't expect next-generation games to run at 30 to 60 fps, nor do I expect them to run at 240 fps. I expect no less than 60 to 120 fps.
My question is, how much of a beneficial impact, if any, on game development is a greater fps supposed to have at this point?
As video and audio technology improve in the next couple of years, I believe that increased fps will be considered very normal as processing power increases.
Fps development suggests that the maximum perception of the human eye is a little over 100 fps, which must mean that anything higher is technically unnecessary.
The ability to render at 240 fps may sound impressive and all, but I think that in another couple of years, this will not mean much — just as PlayStations of past generations are now less amazing.
In my opinion, a PlayStation 4 capable of reaching a maximum 240 fps is another step up, but a rather tiny one if the human eye is unable to notice such a difference.
The opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are the writer's own and do not necessarily reflect the policies of The Japan Times.
With your current subscription plan you can comment on stories. However, before writing your first comment, please create a display name in the Profile section of your subscriber account page.