Thank you for the editorial "Teachers leaving jobs," but I am afraid you are missing the elephant in the room: student numbers.
As the parent of a child in the third grade, it is shocking to learn that the powers-that-be in education feel that more students crammed into a class is better. In 2009, my son was to enter a first-grade class of 39 students. When I heard this, I decided to look around and found another school with only nine students in a class. The reason there were only nine students was that the school was scheduled to be shut down in 2011, which it was.
Still, my husband and I thought the smaller class size was better for our son. I tried unsuccessfully to get the school to stay open with, say, 24 students in one class and 24 in another. I was told that it was not economically feasible and that having up to 40 students in a class was legal.
It was no surprise to learn later that the new teacher in charge of the 39 students went on medical leave because of classroom "breakdown" and that a veteran teacher was called in to deal with the unruly class.
Public schools have some very dedicated teachers, but forcing 40 students into a tight space and telling them to learn is quite ridiculous. When my son is older and I can afford it, I will surely put him in a private school with a smaller class size.
The opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are the writer's own and do not necessarily reflect the policies of The Japan Times.
With your current subscription plan you can comment on stories. However, before writing your first comment, please create a display name in the Profile section of your subscriber account page.