The official inquiry in London about the Iraq war is not a trial or an attempt to assign blame. It is an attempt to uncover the facts about the war and to consider lessons that should be learned from the war. Much of the testimony, which the inquiry has heard recently, has been about whether the war was legal under international law and was a "just" war — morally justifiable.
The Chilcot inquiry heard from the legal advisers to the foreign secretary. They testified that, in their view, in the absence of a further U.N. resolution, the war was illegal. They explained that they had so advised the then foreign secretary, Jack Straw, who was himself a lawyer but not, as Foreign Office officials pointed out, an international lawyer. Straw had dismissed the advice that had been given to him. One of the two Foreign Office lawyers had resigned in protest.
The inquiry also heard from Lord Goldsmith, the attorney general at the time, who was a friend of then Prime Minister Tony Blair. He had at first taken a similar view about the illegality of military action against Iraq and had sent a long memorandum to the prime minister explaining his reasoning. However, after discussions with American lawyers, he had changed his mind and eventually decided that action against Iraq would be legal.
With your current subscription plan you can comment on stories. However, before writing your first comment, please create a display name in the Profile section of your subscriber account page.