FLORENCE, Italy — China's decision to execute the head of its drug regulatory agency has rekindled international debate about capital punishment. It is an age-old question, one that harks back to Plato, who in his "Laws" saw the need to punish by death those who commit egregious crimes.
Supporters of capital punishment usually put forward three arguments to justify state-sanctioned killing of murderers. First, there is the old law of "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth." In the words of Immanuel Kant, no other "penalty is capable of satisfying justice."
Then there is a utilitarian argument: capital punishment deters many criminals from murder. Furthermore, killing murderers prevents recidivism: if released from prison, they might kill again.
With your current subscription plan you can comment on stories. However, before writing your first comment, please create a display name in the Profile section of your subscriber account page.