NEW YORK -- The New York Times has an intriguing take on Japan. The latest example is an article with the heading "Atrocity Amnesia: Japan Rewrites Its Manchuria Story" (Sept. 19).
Earlier, it ran a century-old photograph of a group of Japanese military officers in heavy overcoats lined up for a camera, with a naked, apparently tortured man lying face down on a makeshift cot or stretcher on the floor. The Times dug that out when news of Abu Ghraib prison abuse became headlines. Before then -- well, similar instances are too many to count.
Actually, the article about Manchuria, by Howard French, is a typical case of an eye-grabbing headline followed by a report containing less than advertised. Indeed, the discrepancy in this instance -- which comes with a large, grainy 73-year-old photograph of the Japanese Army marching down a narrow street in Manchuria -- is great enough to make me wonder if the editor, in choosing the headline, merely wanted to perpetuate the Times' view of Japan and its history.
With your current subscription plan you can comment on stories. However, before writing your first comment, please create a display name in the Profile section of your subscriber account page.