CHIANG MAI, Thailand -- International public opinion seems focused almost exclusively on the issue of Iraq these days while other important regional developments are relegated to the back burner. Among the developments that deserve greater attention are the moves toward peace in Sri Lanka.
The background to the tragic conflict on this island is well known, but it is useful to recall the image of Sri Lanka that was held in Asia and the West in the early '70s: that of a wonderful tourist destination, a peaceful tropical paradise with pristine landscapes and beaches. This image was shattered by the ruthless internecine strife that erupted in 1983 and continued for nearly two decades. Finally, both parties, exhausted from so many years of suffering, opted for a frail ceasefire earlier this year.
It seems of paramount importance to try to sustain this unique moment and build foundations for a brighter future upon it. But first we must clear the air of some misconceptions that are persistently brought forward by the international media. The roots of the conflict should not be portrayed as essentially religious, even though the Sinhalese majority is Buddhist and the Tamil Tigers Hindus. The dispute, at its core, has been fought over privileges and resources, as in so many other secessionist movements. This point has been made on many occasions, most recently at a symposium on "Buddhism and Conflict Transformation" organized by the Rissho Kosei-kai Japanese lay Buddhist association in New York. If early grievances had been immediately addressed, the subsequent tragedy might have been averted. But as past deeds or omissions cannot be undone, there is still wisdom in correcting course at a later stage, and this is what appears to be happening now.
With your current subscription plan you can comment on stories. However, before writing your first comment, please create a display name in the Profile section of your subscriber account page.