HONOLULU -- It looks like the Antiballistic Missile Treaty is destined to end, not with a bang, but with a whimper. Earlier doomsday predictions notwithstanding, Washington's unilateral withdrawal from the treaty (the required six-months' notice was given Dec. 13) is not expected to usher in a new Cold War between the United States and Russia. Nor is it likely to undermine the other Soviet-era strategic arms reduction agreements, or to prompt a new arms race between the two nuclear giants.
In fact, both sides have agreed to significant new reductions in their respective nuclear arsenals coincident with the treaty-withdrawal announcement.
Nonetheless, abrogating the ABM Treaty was a singularly bad idea. While Moscow has little alternative but to accept Washington's decision and to proceed with the crafting of a new, more positive relationship with Washington, this unilateral decision will damage Russian President Vladimir Putin's domestic credibility and make it harder for him to expand his cooperation with the U.S.
With your current subscription plan you can comment on stories. However, before writing your first comment, please create a display name in the Profile section of your subscriber account page.