Use of the new open-list balloting system in the proportional representation segment of the July 29 Upper House election has exposed a number of defects. The basic flaw is that it favors candidates from major parties, particularly those who count on organized votes.
The open-list system, as opposed to the closed-list system, allows voters either to select from numbers of candidates prepared on a party-by-party basis or to vote for parties of their choice. One problem, as many voters must have found, is that it is a bother to pinpoint the name of a favored candidate -- if there is one -- on a lengthy list printed in small type. In the last election, a total of 204 candidates ran in the PR constituency.
Still, it was a bother worth taking for those who had particular candidates in mind -- and for those who did not vote for parties, that was the only alternative unless they decided to abstain. The statistics show a majority of voters chose parties, suggesting that they had no personal preferences for or no reasonable knowledge of individual candidates.
With your current subscription plan you can comment on stories. However, before writing your first comment, please create a display name in the Profile section of your subscriber account page.