The race for the most powerful post in sports, the presidency of the International Olympic Committee, already enveloped in the secrecy and byzantine regulations of a 130-year-old club, has become stranger — and much nastier — as decision day looms.
Smear campaigns have targeted some of the leading contenders in the final days before the vote, scheduled for Thursday in Costa Navarino, Greece. This past weekend, social media posts and little-known websites spread lurid claims of previous actions by two of the candidates, without providing evidence or citing sources — suggestions of personal wrongdoing serious enough to sink their campaigns. Neither the IOC nor the candidates have commented publicly, but the allegations became grist for gossip at the IOC gathering.
A few days earlier, an anonymous author emailed a complaint, reviewed by The New York Times, to the IOC’s chief ethics official, outlining a different set of allegations — a string of potential campaign rule breaches — without naming particular candidates. The complaint was detailed enough to rattle the campaigns and the committee’s staff.
With your current subscription plan you can comment on stories. However, before writing your first comment, please create a display name in the Profile section of your subscriber account page.