In his closing argument Friday, a lawyer for Pfc. Bradley Manning portrayed the former U.S. Army intelligence analyst as a naive but brave and conscientious objector to the wartime conduct of the United States.
In a sometimes biting rebuttal to Thursday's closing arguments by a military prosecutor, defense attorney David Coombs said Manning's decision to leak classified U.S. documents to the anti-secrecy group WikiLeaks came only after he began pursuing intelligence reports and found evidence of wanton use of force and unjustified policies.
Manning was "willing to pay a price" for his actions, Coombs said. Manning sought to "spark a worldwide discussion" about what he came to see as U.S. abuses that were going unnoticed and unpunished, the lawyer added.
With your current subscription plan you can comment on stories. However, before writing your first comment, please create a display name in the Profile section of your subscriber account page.