The Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that Fukuoka authorities acted illegally to cut a family's welfare benefits because it had saved some of the aid for a daughter's education fund.
Although the top court dismissed the family's demand for compensation for the amount deducted from their benefits, their lawyers hailed the ruling as a landmark decision that cautions against rigid restrictions on how welfare recipients use the money.
In response to the ruling, a Fukuoka welfare office that had handled the family's case said it would review its 1990 decision to cut their benefits.
With your current subscription plan you can comment on stories. However, before writing your first comment, please create a display name in the Profile section of your subscriber account page.