Academia has wised up to marketing, as seen in this title evoking botanical butchery. Far from carnivorous mischief, this scholarly work shows how state propaganda changes the meaning of cultural symbols.
Flowers That Kill: Communicative Opacity in Political Spaces, by Emiko Ohnuki-Tierney
296 pages
Stanford University, Nonfiction.
Emiko Ohnuki-Tierney, a professor of anthropology at the University Of Wisconsin, compares fascist regimes in Japan and Germany, with a focus on symbol usage in the run-up to World War II. She cites various associations of cherry blossoms in Japanese history — from love and youth to impermanence and debauchery, even madness — to show how everyday symbols can be ambiguous. By the 1930s, the blossoms "marched with the military" as a symbol of sacrifice for the Emperor — a nationalist hijack aided by their opacity. When a cherry blossom was painted onto each tokkotai (suicide fighter plane), most pilots were unaware that the short-lived petals now symbolized their own death.
In a similar shift, the Nazis appropriated roses. Besides romance, red roses in Europe stood for socialist parties and the labor movement, before they were swallowed by Nazi ideology.
The scope expands here to other symbols that shaped Japan's sense of collective self. Ohnuki-Tierney explores the myth of "pure" Japanese rice and shows the Emperor as a "zero signifier" — an inaudible shadow leader, far removed from a dictator personality.
The vast detail in this crossover thesis can at times make the book feel loose-jointed. Still, as debate continues over the meaning of the Japanese Constitution or the Confederate battle flag in America, this study adds valuable insights into the workings of symbolism and identity.
With your current subscription plan you can comment on stories. However, before writing your first comment, please create a display name in the Profile section of your subscriber account page.